In this article, we will look at the comparison of Let’s Encrypt certificates and Basic DV certificates from Symantec, which is exclusively offered to its customers by ZONER software.
lets encrypt vs basic DV
Basic DV is an initiative of Symantec , the largest certification authority in the world. The certificate can be issued by 4 selected webhosters in the world and one of them is ZONER software, i.e. CZECHIA.COM .
A ZONER customer receives a certificate for each domain and can have as many as they want (including subdomains). If he has hosting with ZONER, he can install the certificate automatically with one click. No one prevents the customer from downloading the certificate with the private key and starting to use it on their server or device. The certificate is valid just like the domain (for one year) and is automatically renewed (also on hosting).
Advantages of Basic DV:
the traditional way of obtaining a certificate without a software client on the server
the customer obtains the certificate in the same way as with a paid CA
exhibits the largest CA in the world with a 20-year tradition
he doesn’t have to have an active service, he can do the installation himself and it’s completely up to him
customer support will advise and help
there are no exposure limits
CA respects CAA records
publishes certificates to CT logs
verification via the signed DNS zone of ZONER
Disadvantages of Basic DV
the certificate is only for one DNS name
for customers of other web hosts, the fact that it is provided only by ZONER and CZECHIA.COM
Register domains or transfer them indonesia phone number data using the CZECHIA.COM portal to ZONER and you will automatically receive this free SSL certificate from Symantec.
Let’s Encrypt is a certificate authority founded in 2015 that issues certificates for free. Mozilla , the EFF how to take part in bidding and learn how to win Foundation are involved in CA , and various other IT firms are sponsoring it. CA is not commercial, so no other income is guaranteed.
Let’s Encrypt has a unique approach
To issuing certificates. This requires their software client, which uses its own web server for authentication and installs it on the server after obtaining the certificate (modifies its configuration). The idea is that the server administrator doesn’t have to worry about anything (which kind of defeats his mission). Certificates are only valid for 90 days, which I do not mention as a disadvantage, because the client renews automatically.
In addition to the method of acquisition, the CA itself can raise questions. It’s good that it’s an independent entity, but it’s not in its power to trust the certificates, and as I mentioned, it has cz lists no revenue. There may be issues with the sustainability of both.